logo
HomeTrainingPublicationsUsability ToolsAbout
Evidence-Based Information, Training and Tools for Optimizing the Usability of Computer Systems

User Interface Update 2006

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DAY 1

Unit 1 - General Usability Issues

  • How Helpful Is Help?
  • How Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study?
  • Card Sorting: How Many Users to Test
  • Factor Analysis of Card Sort Data
  • A Comparison of Subject-based Classification Strategies for Enhanced Usability
  • Competitive Testing
  • HCI International - Location of Authors

Unit 2 - Displays

  • The Effects of Line Length on Reading
  • Text Legibility and the Letter Superiority Effect
  • Is Multiple-Column Online Text Better?
  • Reading Online Text with a Poor Layout
  • A Comparative Analysis of Color
  • The Influence of Color on the Efficiency of the Work at the Computer
  • An Eye-tracking Approach to Inattentional Blindness
  • The Effects of Individual Differences in Working Memory on Multimedia Learning

Unit 3 - Interactions

  • Breadcrumbs, Usability and Architecture
  • An Application in the Use of the Keyboard to Issue Commands
  • Use and Abuse of the Back Button on English and Non English Web Sites
  • The Design and Presentation Order of Web Page Buttons

Unit 4 - Past Research

  • New Research-Based Guidelines
  • Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 2005
  • The Top Ten Mistakes and Why They Are Mistakes

 

DAY 2

Unit 5 - User Issues

  • Older Adults and Attitudes Toward Computers
  • Older Adults and Internet Health Information Seeking
  • Assessing User Capabilities from Small Scale Samples

Unit 6 - Web-Related Issues

  • Ranking vs. Categorizing Search Results
  • Natural Language Query vs. Keyword Search

Unit 7 - Usability Testing

  • Augmented Cognition
  • 5-Second Tests: Measuring Your Site's Content Pages
  • Getting the Right Design and the Design Right: Testing Many is Better
  • Beyond the Five-User Assumption: Benefits of Increased Sample Sizes
  • Estimating Completion Rates from Small Samples
  • How Many Subjects are Needed in a Usability Test?
  • How Long Should a Task Take?
  • Seven Common Usability Testing Mistakes
  • Simplified Eye Tracking Enhances Problem Understanding
  • A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Testing
  • Usefulness of Nonverbal Cues from Participants in Usability Testing            
  • Surviving the International Usability Test

 

OBJECTIVES, INTENDED AUDIENCE AND CRITERIA FOR ARTICLES

COURSE OBJECTIVES: These advanced annual courses are designed to keep computer professionals up-to-date with the latest, most useful information concerning the design and development of high quality, professional user interfaces in computer systems.  Each course is totally (100%) new each year!

At the end of this seminar, participants should:

  • Be able to understand most of the recent advances in user interface, usability and user experience technology, particularly those that are of greatest interest to practitioners,
  • Understand the contents of about 50 important research reports that were published in the past year or so, and
  • Be able to state how the major research findings can be applied to improving the usability of computer systems, including Web-based systems and graphical user interfaces.

INTENDED AUDIENCE: The course is intended for computer professionals, including:

  • User interface designers and developers
  • Web designers and developers
  • Developers and programmers
  • Project managers
  • Human factors and ergonomics specialists
  • Systems analysts and systems engineers
  • Documentation and training specialists
  • Usability and user experience specialists
  • Multimedia specialists


WHAT STUDENTS SAY …

"One of the best courses I've ever taken! Don't change a thing."

"You had a super mix of exercises that kept us fresh by using our brains differently."

"The course materials were excellent. Good balance between lecture and relevant exercises."

"Super mix of exercises that kept us fresh by using our brains differently."

"This was a wonderful course. It was informative, up-to-date and entertaining."

"I found the course very useful, despite the fact that I am not a technical person."

"The course contained lots of good information for practical application."

"I really appreciate Dr. Bailey treating us as 'peers' regardless of our experience in the field."

"Again, thanks for a great three days. I don't know when I've enjoyed a class more."

"I came last year and was watching for it this year."

"This is a great collection of research that you compiled in a very readable way."

"Another set of great insights from Dr. Bailey - he pulls it all together and makes it meaningful."

"Great course! One of the few that is on my 'must attend every year' list."

CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ARTICLES

  • Articles that have evidence for stating: "Do this" or "Don’t do that,"
  • Articles that contain useful design and/or evaluation examples,
  • Articles that successfully critique the current user interface development process,
  • Articles that suggest improvements to the user interface development process,
  • Articles that contain useful usability metrics, and
  • Articles that provide helpful insights into system-related user characteristics.

 

 

REFERENCES

Ahlstrom, V. (2005). A comparison of subject-based classification strategies for enhanced usability. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1438

Ahlstrom, V. and Allendoerfer, K. (2005). Human factors usability study on a prototype portal. South Jersey Human Factors Ergonomics Society Mini-Conference on Human Factors in Complex Sociotechnical Systems. Atlantic City International Airport, NJ

Agresti, A. and Coull, B. (1998). Approximate is better than ‘exact’ for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician, 52, 119-126

Ambler, A., Graham, K. and Jenson, P. (2001.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society

Augmented Cognition: An Approach to Increasing Universal Benefit from Information Technology

Aurelio, D. N. (2002). The effects of Web search engine query ambiguity and results sorting method on user performance and preference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston

Aurelio, D. N. and Mourant, R. R. (2002). The effects of Web search engine query ambiguity and results sorting method on user performance and preference [single-term query]. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society’s 46th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Bailey, R., Koyani, S. and Nall, J. (2000), Usability testing of several health information Web sites, National Cancer Institute Technical Report, September 7-8, 2000

Bartek, V. and Cheatham, D. (2003a). Experience remote usability testing, part 1: Examine study results on the benefits and downside of remote usability testing. http://www106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/warmusts1/

Bartek, V. and Cheatham, D. (2003b). Experience remote usability testing, Part 2: Examine the benefits and downside of remote usability testing. http://www106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/warmusts2.html

Bates, M. (1977). Factors affecting subject catalog search success. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 161-169

Batusic, M., and Urban, F. (2002). Preparing tactile graphics for traditional braille printers with brlgrapheditor. Paper presented at the Computers Helping People with Special Needs 8th International Conference, ICCHP 2002, Linz, Austria

Bernard, M. (2001). Developing Schemas for the Location of Common Web Objects. Usability News, 3.1. Retrieved 8/31/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/web_object.htm

Bernard, M. (2002a). Examining User Expectations for the Location of Common E-Commerce Web Objects. Usability News 4.1. Retrieved 9/1/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/web_objectecom.htm

Bernard, M. (2002b). Examining the Effects of Hypertext Shape on User Performance. Usability News, 4.2. Retrieved 8/31/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/42/hypertext.htm

Bernard, M. and Hamblin, C. (2003) Cascading versus Indexed Menu Design. Usability News, Volume 5.1. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/51/menu.htm

Bernard, M. and Mills, M. (2000), So what size and type of font should I use on my Web site? Usability News, 2.2. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/2S/font.htm

Bernard, M., Liao, C. and Mills, M. (2001), Determining the best online font for older adults, Usability News, 3.1. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontSR.htm

Bernard, M., Mills, M., Peterson, M. and Storrer, K. (2001), A comparison of popular online fonts: Which is best and when? Usability News, 3.2. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from
http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3S/font.htm

Bhavnani, S. K. and John, B. E. (1997). From sufficient to efficient usage: An analysis of strategic knowledge. Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ACM Press. (pp. 91-98). Atlanta, GA

Borgatti, S.P. (1994). How to Explain Hierarchical Clustering, from http://www.analytictech.com/networks/hiclus.htm

Bouch, A., Kuchinsky, A., and Bhatti, N. (2000). Quality is in the eye of the beholder: Meeting user’s requirements for Internet quality of service. Proceedings of CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 297-304

Brown, M. (1995). By any other name: Accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories. Library & Information Science Research, 17, 347-385
Buswell, G.T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Buxton, W.  and Sellen, A. Getting the right design and the design right: Testing many is better than one

Caldas, L. C. A. (2002) Otimização do diálogo usuários-organizações na World Wide Web: estudo de caso e avaliação ergonômica de usabilidade de interfaces humano-computador. Rio de Janeiro, 513 p. Dissertação de Mestrado. PUC-Rio, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Carstens, D. S. and Patterson, P. (2005).  Usability Testing of Travel Websites
Florida Institute of Technology. Journal of Usability Studies, Vol 1(1), 47-61

Carton, L. (2002). Homepages That Sell. Retrieved on 9/1/2003 from http://www.eshopability.com/reports.htm

Caters, K., Chalmers, A., and  Ledda, P. (2002). Selective quality rendering by exploiting human inattentional blindness: Looking but not seeing. Proceedings of VRST’02, Hong Kong

Caters, K., Chalmers, A., and Ward, G. (2003). Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, Leuven, Belgium

Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., & Tullis, T. S. (2003) Web usability and age: How design changes can improve performance. ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’03), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 10-11 November 2003

Chan, A.H.S. & Courtney, A.J. (2001). Color Associations for Hong Kong Chinese. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 165-170

Chan, A.H.S., Han, S.H. & Nanthavanij S., Color Associations for Hong Kong Chinese, Korean, and Thai: A Comparison, IEA 2003 Congress, Korea, Aug 24-29

Chevalier, A. and Ivory, M. Y. (2003a, June 22-27). Can novice designers apply usability criteria and recommendations to make web sites easier to use? Paper presented at the
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece

Chevalier, A. and Ivory, M. Y. (2003b). Web site designs: Influences of designer's experience and design constraints. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(1), 57-87

Clopper, C. J., and Pearson, E. (1934). The use of confidence intervals for fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika, 26, 404-413

Craigslist. (2004). Seattle/Tacoma online community. Retrieved November 8, 2004, from http://seattle.craigslist.org/

Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D. and Rogers, W. (2001). The Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE): A program to enhance technology for older adults. Gerontechnology, 1, 50-59

Dannecker, E. A., Hausenblas, H. A., Connaughton, D. P. and Lovins, T. R. (2003). Validation of a stages of exercise change questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(3), 236-247

Del Gado, E. M. (1996). Culture and design. In Del Gado, E. M. & Nielsen, J. International User Interfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 74-87

Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). Annual update of the HHS poverty guidelines. Federal Register, pp. 7335-7338

Dong, J., Martin, S., & Waldo, P. (2001). A user input and analysis tool for information architecture. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing System – CHI 2001 (pp. 24-25). New York: ACM

Dray, S. and Mrazek, D. (1996). A Day in the life: studying context across cultures. In Del Gado, E. M. & Nielsen, J. InternationalUser Interfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 242-256

Dray, S. and Siegel, D. (2004). Remote Possibilities? International Usability Testing at a Distanc., 10-17
                                      
Downs, C. M. and Jackson, A. F. (2001). Interactive help: Adapting content for multiple users. Paper presented at the STC Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.

Duchnicky, R. L. and Kolers, P. A. (1983). Readability of text scrolled on visual
display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors, 25, 683- 692

Duchowski, A. T. (2003). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. London: Springer

Dumas, J., and Redish, J. C. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Portland, OR: Intellect

Dumais, S., Cutrell, E. and Chen, H. (2001). Optimizing search by showing results in context. In Proceedings of the SIG-CHI on Human factors in computing systems--CHI 2001 (pp. 279-284). New York: Association for Computing Machinery

Dutke, S., & Reimer, T. (2000). Evaluation of two types of online help for application software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(4), 307-315

Dyson, M. C. (2004). How physical text layout affects reading from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23, 377- 393

Dyson, M. C., and Haselgrove, M. (2001). The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 585-612

Dyson, M. C. and  Kipping, G. J. (1998). The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32, 150-181
Ferguson, T. (1998). Digital doctoring: Opportunities and challenges in electronic-patient communication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1261-1262

Egan, D. (1988) “Individual Differences in HCI” in The Handbook of Human Computer Interaction Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 541-565

Everitt, B. (1974). Cluster Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books

Felipe Memória and Claudia Mont’Alvão, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

Fitts, P.M., Jones, R.E. and Milton, J.L. (1950). Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 9(2), 24-29

Frick, T. W.,  Dodge, T. Liu, X. and Bude, Su, B. (2004). How Many Subjects Are Needed in a Usability Test to Determine Effectiveness of a Website? Indiana University Bloomington Indiana University Technical Report
http://education.indiana.edu/%7Efrick/hci_submission_frick_et_al.may26.pdf

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198

Forrester Research. (1999). Why most web sites fail. Unpublished manuscript
Fowler, S. L., & Stanwick, V. R. (1995). The GUI style guide. Cambridge, MA: AP Professional

Furnas, G., Landauer, T., Gomez, L and Dumais, S. (1983). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication: An analysis and a solution. Bell System Technical Journal, 62, 1753-1803

Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Barnes, V., Finn, R., Grischkowsky, N., and Minuto, A. (1987). Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper: Attempts to isolate a single-variable explanation. Human Factors, 29, 269-299

Grabinger, R. S. and Osman-Jouchoux, R. (1996). Designing screens for learning. In H. van Oostendorp and S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation

Grayling, T. (1998). Fear and loathing of the help menu: A usability test of online help. Technical Communication, 45(2), 168-179

Gremmett, P. (2003). Utilizing a user’s context to improve search results. CHI 2003-Best practices and future visions for search UIs - A workshop. From http://home.earthlink.net/~searchworkshop/

Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., Goble, C., & Stevens, R. (2004). Proceedings of Hypertext’04, August 9–13, 2004, Santa Cruz, California, USA, pp. 116-125

Heines, J., Ivory, M. Y., Borner, K. and Gehringer, E. F. (2003, February 19-23). Panel on the development, maintenance, and use of course web sites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Reno, NV

Henderson, J.M. and Hollingworth, A. (2003). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497

Hsu, J. (2002,). Help systems and markup coding: An investigation of the impact of help systems on user effectiveness and productivity using a markup language. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, CA

Hopkin, V.D. (1994). Color on Air-Traffic-Control Displays, Information Display, 1, 14-18

Houghton, R. C., Jr. (1984). Online help systems: A conspectus. Communications of the ACM, 27(2), 126-133

Hyönä, J., Radach, R. and Deubel, H. (2003). The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science

Instone, K. (2002). Location, Path & Attribute Breadcrumbs. Retrieved February 21, 2003, from http://userexperience.org/uefiles/breadcrumbs/KEI-3Breadcrumbs.pdf

ISO. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO 9241-11:1998(E)). Geneva, Switzerland: Author

Ivory, M. Y. (2003). Automated web site evaluation: Researchers' and practitioners' perspectives (Vol. 4). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Ivory, M. Y. (2004). SmartSites toolkit for evaluating course web sites (Technical Report No. IS-TR-2004-12-02). Seattle, WA: Information School, University of Washington

Ivory, M. Y., and Hearst, M. A. (2002). Improving web site design. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(2), 56-63

Ivory, M. Y., Martin, A.P., Megraw, R. and Slabosky, B. (2005).
University of Washington – Seattle HCI International - 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Jaccard, P. (1912). The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. The New Phytologist, 11(2), 37-50

Jackson-Sanborn, E., Odess-Harnish, K., and Warren, N. (2002). Website accessibility: A study of ADA compliance (Technical Report No. TR-2001-05): University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, School of Information and Library Science

Jacobs, L., Keown, C. and Worthley, R. (1991). Cross-cultural color comparisons: global mareters beware!. International Marketing Review, 8, 3, 21-30

Jacob, R.J. and Karn, K.S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises, In H.J. Radach and H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science

Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. London, UK: Cassel and Collier Macmillan

Jardine, N. and Sibson, R. (1971). Mathematical Taxonomy. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Johnson, D. (1998). Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis.Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury

Josephson, S. and Holmes, M. E. (2002). Visual attention to repeated images on the World-Wide Web: Another look at scanpath theory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4), 539-548

Kahn, P., and Lenk, K. (1998). Principles of typography for user interface design.
Interactions, 5(6), 15-29

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 80, 341-350

Karn, K.S., Ellis, S. and Juliano, C. (2000). The hunt for usability: Tracking eye movements. SIGCHI Bulletin, November / December, 11

Kaufman, L., and Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preference and value Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting 2005 640 tradeoffs. New York, NY USA: Cambridge University Press

Kiger, J. I. (1984). The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20, 201-213

Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole
Publishing Co

Kowal, E.  and  Miedziarek, S. (2005) The Influence of Color on the Efficiency of the Work at the Computer National University for Professional Education – Poland HCI International - 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Krug, S. (2001). Não me faça pensar: uma abordagem do bom senso à navegabilidade da Web. São Paulo: Market Books

Krull, R., Friauf, J., Brown-Grant, J., and Eaton, A. (2001). Usability trends in an online help system: User testing on three releases of help for a visual programming language. Paper presented at the Professional Communication Conference

Lamantia, J. (2003). Analyzing Card Sort Results with a Spreadsheet Template. Retrieved on April 12, 2005 from the Boxes and Arrows web site: http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/analyzing_card_sort_results_with_a_spreadsheet_template.php

Landauer, T. K. (1997). Behavioral research methods in human-computer interaction. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, and P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 203-227). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland

Lane, D. M., Napier, H. A., Peres, S. C. and Sándor, A. (2005). The hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: The failure to make the transition from menus and icons tool bars to keyboard shortcuts. International journal of human computer interaction, 18(2), 133-144

Laplace, P. S. (1812). Theorie analytique des probabilitites. Paris, France: Courcier

Larson, K and Czerwinski, M. (1998). Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent from information retrieval. Proceedings of CHI’98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 25-32

Lawrence, S. and Giles, C. L. (1998). Context and page analysis for improved Web search. IEEE Internet Computing, 2, 38-46

Lewis, J. R. (1996). Binomial confidence intervals for small sample usability studies. In G. Salvendy and A. Ozok (eds.), Advances in Applied Ergonomics: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Applied Ergonomics -- ICAE '96,  Istanbul, Turkey: USA Publishing, 732-737

Lewis, J. R (1982) "Testing Small System Customer Setup" in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting p. 718-720

Lida, B. and Chaparro, B (2003). Breadcrumb navigation: further investigation of usage. Usability News, Wichita

Long, K., Styles, L., Andre, T. and Malcom, W. (2005) Usefulness of nonverbal cues from participants in usability testing sessions, United States Air Force Academy – Colorado HCI International: 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 180-184

Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.

Martin, A. P., Ivory, M. Y., Megraw, R., & Slabosky, B. (2005, July 22-27). How helpful is help? Use of and satisfaction with user assistance. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV

Martin, S. and Kidwell, D. (2001). A case study in cluster analysis for intranet organization

Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies- Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Retrieved May, 2005, from http://www.adammathes.com

Maurer, D. and Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide. Retrieved on February 8, 2005 from the Boxes and Arrows web site: http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide.php

Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press

McIver, J. P., and Carmines, E. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Medlock, M.C., Wixon, D., Terrano, M., Romero, R.L. and Fulton, B. (2002). Using the RITE Method to improve products: a definition and a case study. Proceedings of the Usability Professionals’ Association 11th Annual Conference, Orlando, FL

Miller, C. S., and Remington, R. W. (2002). Effects of structure and label ambiguity on information navigation. Proceedings of CHI’02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 630-631

Miller, D. P. (1981). The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, p. 296-300

Miranda G., (2005). Capra, Factor Analysis of Card Sort Data: An Alternative to Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University - Blacksburg, VA
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting—2005 691

Moore, C.M. (2001). Inattentional blindness: Perception or memory and what does it matter. Psyche, 7, NP

Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J. and Chabris, C.F. (2000). Sustained inattentional blindness: The role of location in the detection of unexpected dynamic events. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, 6(14), NP

Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E. and Chabris, C.F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12, 9-17

Murphy, J. D. (2001). International usability testing: who should do it – internationals or locals? In Proceedings of OzCHI, Perth, Australia: Churchlands, Edith Cowan University Press, 96-101

Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking in perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J Gibson Ed. A D Pick (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp 201-219

Neisser, U. and Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480-494

Neumann, J., Ross, J., Terrence, J. and Mouloua, M, (2005). Trend Analysis of the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction from 1989 to 2004 University of Central Florida – Orlando Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting

Newby, E.A., and Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention. Perception, 27, 1025-1040

Niece. EH Mac (1953). Industrial Specifications John Wiley and Sons

Nielsen, C. and Stage, J. (2004). Usability evaluation feedback from usability evaluation to user interface design: are usability reports any good?

Nielsen, J. (1990). Big paybacks from ‘discount’ usability engineering. IEEE Software, 7(3), 107-108

Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability – The practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 20804

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25- 62). New York: Wiley

Nielsen, J. (1996). International usability testing. In Del Gado, E. M. & Nielsen, J. International User Interfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 119

 

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann

Nielsen, J. (1998). Using Link Titles to Help Users Predict Where They Are Going, Alertbox, January 11, 1998. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980111.html

Nielsen, J. and Levy, J. (1994) Measuring Usability: Preference vs. Performance. Communications of the ACM, 37, p. 66-76

Nielsen, J. and Sano, D. (1994). SunWeb: User Interface Design for Sun Microsystem's Internal Web. In Electronic Proceedings of the Second World Wide Web Conference '94: Mosaic and the Web. Retrieved February 8, 2005 from the NCSA web site:
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/IT94/Proceedings/HCI/nielsen /sunweb.html

Nielsen, J., and Tahir, M. (2001). Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. New Riders

Nokia, A.K., Kekalained, A., Cankar, M. Kallio, T. and  Kankainen, T. (2005). Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Testing Finland Journal of Usability Studies, Vol. 1(1), November 2005, 4-17

Norman, D. A. (1998). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Nunnally, J. C. and Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York,
NY: McGraw-Hill

Oracle and Kindlund, K. (2005). How Long Should a Task Take? Identifying Specification Limits for Task Times in Usability Tests Jeff Sauro –– Intuit HCI International - 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Osgood, C.E., May, W.H. & Miron, M.S. (1975). Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning, Chicago: University of Illinois Press

Overgaard, M. and Pedersen, M. (2005). ETI A/S - Denmark Proceedings of INTERACT 2005: IFIP TC13 International Conference

Pan, Hembrooke,  Granda, G., Feusner and Newman, (2004). Determinants of web page viewing behavior: An eye-tracking study, Proceedings of the Eye tracking research & applications symposium on Eye tracking research & applications, 2004, San Antonio, Texas

Pappas, J. M., Fishel, S.R., Moss, J. D., Hicks, J. M., and Leech, T.D., (2005). An eue-tracking approack to inattentional blindness. Clemson University - Department of Psychology and Computer Science. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1658

Parush, A. P. a. D. K. (2001). Online help: Too much of a good thing? STC Usability SIG Newsletter, 7(3)

Pelz, J.B., Canosa, R. and Babcock, J. (2000). Extended tasks elicit complex eye movement patterns. In: Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000. ACM Press, NY, 37-43

Perfetti, C. (2005) 5-Second Tests: Measuring Your Site's Content Pages, User Interface Engineering http://www.uie.com/articles/five_second_test/

Peres, S. C., Tamborello, F. P., II, Fleetwood, M. D., Chung, P. and Paige-Smith, D. L. (2004). Keyboard shortcut usage: The roles of social factors and computer experience.
Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, pp. 803-807, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Persad, U., Langdon, P. and Clarkson, J. (2005). Assessing User Capabilities from Small Scale Samples, University of Cambridge HCI International - 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Peterson, M. K. and Parker, L. L. (2005). Surviving the international usability test: tools and strategies for a successful outcome. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 2080

Pew Internet and American Life Project (2003). Interne Health Resources. http://www.pewinternet.org

Pollak, K. I., Carbonari, J. P., Diclemente, C. C., Niemann, Y. F. and Mullen, P. D. (1998).Causal relationships of processes of change and decisional balance: Stage-specific
models for smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 437-448

Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G., Marcus, B. H., Rakowski,
W., Fiore, C., Harlow, L. L., Redding, C. A., Rosenbloom, D. and Rossi, S. R. (1994).
Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology,
13, 39-46

Purchase, H. C., and Worrill, J. (2002). An empirical study of on-line help design: Features and principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(5), 539-567

Rainie, L., and Horrigan, J. (2005). A decade of adoption: How the Internet has woven itself into American life. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report, 1/25/2005. Retrieved on February 27, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Internet_Status_2005.pdf.

Ramsay, J., Barbesi, A., and Preece, J. (1998). A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web. Interacting with Computers, 10, 77-86

Resnick, P. (1999). Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language. Journal of Artificial
Intelligence Research, 11: 95-130

Robertson, J. (2001). Information Design Using Card Sorting. Retrieved on April 12, 2005 from the Step Two Designs website, http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting/

Robinson, T.N., Eng, P.K., and Gustafson, D. (1998). An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age. Journal of the American MedicalAssociation, 280, 1264-1269 Available:http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf. Accessed: 4/15/04

Rohrer, R. M. and Swing, E. (1997). Web-based information visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, July/August, 52-59

Rosson, M. B. (1983). Patterns of experience in text editing. Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA USA, pp. 171-175, ACM Press. Slovic, P. (1987). Perceptions of risk. Science, 236, 280-285

Roxanski, E. P., Haake, A.R., Vigliotti, A. M., Pelz J.B. and Xerox, K. S., (2005). Simplified eye tracking enhances problem understanding and solution discovery in usability testing rochester institute of technology, New York Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting

Rozanski, E.P., Vigliotti, A.M., Karn, K.S., Haake, A.R., Pelz, J.B. and Dalal, N. (2003). Eye tracking: A tool for the discount usability toolbox. Abstracts of the 12th European Conference on Eye Movements

Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: how to plain, design and conduct effective tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Santos, R. (2000). Abordagem heurística para avaliação da usabilidade de interfaces. Rio de Janeiro, 175 p

Sauro, J. (2004). Restoring confidence in usability results. From Measuring Usability, article retrieved Jan 2005 from http://www.measuringusability.com/conf_intervals.htm

Sauro, J and  Kindlund E. (2005) “A Method to Standardize Usability Metrics into a Single Score.” in Proceedings of the Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems

Sauro, J., Oracle, Lewis, J. R. and Raton, B., (2005). Estimations completions rates from small samples using binomial confidence intervals: Comparisons and recommendations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 2102

Selvidge, P. (1999). How Long is Too Long to Wait for a Website to Load? Usability News, 1.2. Retrieved 8/30/2003 from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/1s/time_delay.htm

Schweibenz, W. (2000). Does help really help? [terminology-related problems with online help systems]. NFD Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 51(4), 199-207

Shaikh, A. D., and Chaparro, B. S. (2004). A survey of online reading habits of Internet users.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 875-879

Shaikh, A. D. and Chaparro, B.S. (2000). The effects of line length on reading performance of online news articles. Software Usability Research Laboratory, Wichita State University

Sheedy, J.E.,  Subbaram, M.,  Zimmerman, A.B. and Hayes, J.H. Text Legibility and the Letter Superiority Effect Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 2005, 797-815

Shin, A. (2005). Newspaper circulation continues to decline: Internet, cable cited as competition. Washington Post. Retrieved May 20, 2005, from http://www.washingtonpost.com

Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 84--91

Simons, D.J. and Chabris, C.F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074

Snowberry, K., Parkinson, S. and Sisson, N. (1983). Computer display menus. Ergonomics, 26, 699-712

Spool, J.M., (2005). Seven common usability testing mistakes, User Interface Engineering http://www.uie.com/articles/usability_testing_mistakes/

Spool, J. M., Perfetti, C. and Brittan, D. (2004). Designing for the scent of information. Available on 2/27/2005 from http://www.uie.com/reports/scent_of_information/.

Sravanapudi, A. (2004). Categorization—It’s all about context. Econtent, July/August, 27(7/8), S23

Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., Sfyrakis, M. and Paramythis, A. (1998, October). Universal accessibility in HCI: Process-oriented design guidelines and tool requirements. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, Stockholm, Sweden

Stover, A., Coyne, K. P., and Nielsen, J. (2002). Designing usable site maps for websites. January 2002. Available 2/27/2005 from http://www.nngroup.com/reports/sitemaps/

Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Computer-assisted research design and
analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Tinker, M.A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press

Tobii User Manual. (2003). Tobii, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.tobii.com/ Version 2.1

Tohidi, M, Baecker, R., Buxton, W. and Sellen, A. (2006) Getting the right design and the design right: Testing many is better than one Microsoft CHI 2006 Proceedings

Trimmel, M., Meixner-Pendleton, M., and Haring, S. (2003). Stress response caused by system response time when searching for information on the Internet. Human Factors, 45, 615-622

Tsunoda, T., Yamaoka, T., Yamashita, K., Matsunobe, T., Hashiya, Y., Nishiyama, Y. and Takahasi, K. (2001). Measurement of task performance times and ease of use: Comparison of various menu structures and depth on the web. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 45th Annual Meeting, p. 1225-1229

Tullis, T. S. (1985). Designing a menu-based interface to an operating system. Proceedings of CHI'85 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Francisco, CA, April 1985, p.79-84

Tullis, T. S. (1997). Screen design. In M. Helander, T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human- Computer Interaction, 2nd Edition. Amsterdam: North-Holland

 

Tullis, T. S., Boynton, J. L. and Hersh, H. (1995), Readability of fonts in the windows environment, CHI'95 Conference Proceedings - Extended Abstracts, 127-128

Tullis, T. S., Connor, E. and LeDoux, L. C. (2005). A study of website navigation methods. Usability Professionals Association Conference, June 27-July 1, 2005, Montreal, Canada

Tullis, T. S., Catani, M., Chadwick-Dias, A. and Cianchette, C. (2005). Presentation of information. In R. W. Proctor and K.-P. L. Vu (Eds.), Handbook of human factors in web design (pp. 107-133). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Tullis, T. S. and Cianchette, C. (2003) An Investigation of Web Site Navigation Techniques. Usable Bits, 2nd Quarter 2003. Retrieved 8/31/2003 from http://hid.fidelity.com

Tullis, T. S. and Fleischman, S. (2004). Tabular data: Finding the best format. Intercom, June 2004, pp. 12-14

Tullis, T. S. and Fleischman, S. (2002). The latest word on fonts for the web. Retrieved on 2/27/2005 from http://hid.fidelity.com/q22002/fonts.htm

Tullis, T. and Wood, L. (2004), How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? Proceedings UPA’2004

Van Oostendorp, H. and Bonebakker, C. (1998).Difficulties in updating mental representations during reading news reports. In H. van Oostendorp (Ed.), The Construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 319-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc

Virzi, R.A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? Human Factors, 34, 457-468

Van Darr, D. and Deshe, O. (2002). Evaluation of a Visual Layering Methodology for Color Coding Control Room Displays, Applied Ergonomics, 33, 371-377

Von Winterfeldt, D. and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research New York, NY USA: Cambridge University Press

Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 209-212

Witten, I. H. and Frank, E. (1999). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann

White, J. V. (1990). Color for the electronic age. New York: Watson-Guptill

Whiteside, J., Bennett, J. and Holtzblatt, K. (1988) "Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution” in The Handbook of Human Computer Interaction Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 791-81

Yu, R.F., Chan, H.S. Shen, Y.  Han S.H., Nanthavanij, S. and Tsinghua, A. (2005). Comparative Analysis of Color Associations for Different Regional Populations University – Beijing HCI International - 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Zaphiris, P. and Mtei, l. (1997). Depth vs. Breadth in the Arrangement of Web Links. Retrieved 8/31/2003 from http://otal.umd.edu/SHORE/bs04/

Zona Research (1999). The Economic Impacts of Unacceptable Web Site Download Speeds
Zona Research White Paper, 1999. Retrieved 5/25/2000 from

http://www.zonaresearch.com/deliverables/white%5Fpapers/wp17/index.htm
Home|Training|Publications|Usability Tools |About

Contact Dr. Bob Bailey at (801) 201-2002 or bob@webusability.com
Copyright 2002 - 2005