![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||
Evidence-Based Information, Training and Tools
for Optimizing the Usability of Computer Systems
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Web Site Identity September, 1999
What should Web site designers do to help users know when they are still in the same Web site or have moved to a different site after clicking on a link? This question was studied by Omanson, et.al., 1998. Their research attempted to determine which dimensions were most important when establishing a Web site identity. They had observed that many Web users are often unaware when they have moved to a different site. In their first experiment, they had 19 adult Web users interact with 42 Web pages from various sites. The participants were shown the Web pages one at a time for about 20 seconds. They were asked to imagine that these were pages visited while browsing the Web, and to indicate whether they were at the same site or at a different site. The subjects also provided information about which aspects of the site most influenced their judgment. The participants identified eight within-page dimensions of web pages that they believed were being used to make decisions:
Had they stopped with this first experiment, the resulting behavior of Web site designers would have been wrong for the next few years. In their second experiment, they had 168 experienced and inexperienced Web users use 23 different Web pages. They evaluated 11 transitions that involved staying on the same site, and 12 transitions that involved going to a different site. Again, each Web page was shown to participants for 20 seconds, and the subjects then indicated whether they were on the same site, or a different site. After making a judgement, the participants were asked to tell which of the eight dimensions most affected their judgments. For both experienced and inexperienced users, "logo" was the primary dimension used. Even though the subjects in the first experiment tried to identify why they had made their judgements, seven of their eight within-page dimensions seemed to have little, or no, actual impact on the decisions being made. (Test participants frequently try very hard to satisfy testers with logical, but meaningless, explanations for their performance.) There are two major findings in this study.
It is possible that the inability to effectively compare the pages was due primarily to working memory limitations (i.e. many people find it difficult to remember details of the page they were looking at just a few seconds ago).
References Omanson, R. C., Cline, J. A., Kilpatrick, C. E., and Dunkerton, M. C., Dimensions affecting Web site identity, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 429-433 (1998). |
||||||||||||
|
Home Contact Dr. Bob Bailey at (801) 201-2002 or bob@webusability.com Copyright 2002 - 2005 |
||||||||||||