![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||
Evidence-Based Information, Training and Tools
for Optimizing the Usability of Computer Systems
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Using Visualization in Websites June, 2003 In some websites the amount of information is so large that the context may be lost whenever it is displayed on a single computer screen. If we try to have the entire structure visible all at once (so we did not lose the context), the details may be too small to read. For example, the HypViewer product on the right below is showing over one million IP addresses. If you think that adding visualization methods to a website automatically will improve user performance in this situation, you may want to consider the results of a couple of recent studies.
The more familiar Internet Explorer also was used for comparison. Korin had 27 undergraduate students first become familiar with the methods, and then use each one of them to find six specific target pages on the ‘porsche.com’ website. The target pages were either 2, 3 or 4 clicks away from the homepage. The researcher reported that Internet Explorer elicited both the fastest retrieval times (p<.05) and the highest percentage correct (p<.05). This was true for retrieving targets requiring 2 or 3 or 4 clicks. The three visualization methods all were reliably slower than Internet Explorer, and differed little among themselves on this task.
These researchers attempted to more clearly understand the effectiveness of information visualization as it is related to information-retrieval tasks. One of their hypotheses was that users would perform more efficiently and accurately with interfaces that had visualization components. They focused on information-retrieval visualization methods that reported variables related to efficiency (performance time) and accuracy (error rate, precision, etc.). To be included in the meta-analysis, they required that a study must:
After combining and analyzing the data from the studies, the researchers found that users did not perform more efficiently, nor more accurately, using visualization methods. They also reported that users performed better when using less sophisticated visualization interfaces (p=.004). Considering the research that is currently available to us, we can conclude that using a visualization technique does not necessarily improve either efficiency or accuracy in information-retrieval tasks. Designers that elect to use any of the existing visualization software tools, definitely should do usability testing to ensure that the technology actually does benefit the users of their websites.
References Werner, K. (2002), A comparison of information visualization methods, CHI 2002 Conference Extended Abstracts, 872-873. Inxight’s ‘Star Tree’: www.inxight.com/products/oem/star_tree/demos.php The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis -- CAIDA’s ‘HypViewer’: TheBrain Technologies Corporation’s ‘The Brain’: www.thebrain.com |
||||||||||||
Home Contact Dr. Bob Bailey at (801) 201-2002 or bob@webusability.com Copyright 2002 - 2005 |
||||||||||||