![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
Evidence-Based Information, Training and Tools
for Optimizing the Usability of Computer Systems
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The Effects of Bold Text on Visual Search: April, 2003
Everybody knows that by making a word bold that it will ‘standout,’ be perceived more readily and (obviously) processed faster. For example, which of the following formats will elicit the fastest performance by customer service representatives -- A or B? A
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Field Identifiers | Field Values | ||||||||||||||||||
| Previous Bill | $33.84 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Previous Payment | 32.75 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | 1.09 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Current Charges | 18.89 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total Billed | 19.98 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Penalty | 4.53 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Amount Due | $24.51 |
||||||||||||||||||
B |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Field Identifiers | Field Values |
||||||||||||||||||
| Previous Bill | $33.84 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Previous Payment | 32.75 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | 1.09 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Current Charges | 18.89 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total Billed | 19.98 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Penalty | 4.53 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Amount Due | $24.51 |
||||||||||||||||||
Kurt Joseph, Benjamin Knott and Rebecca Grier (2002) at SBC Technology Resources in Austin, Texas challenged the conventional wisdom. They believed that the currently used format in their company (similar to “B” above) was actually eliciting (a) slower search times, and (b) lower search accuracy.
They had several experienced computer users answer typical questions such as “What are my current charges” as quickly and as accurately as possible. The subjects answered the questions using either a table like “A” or one like “B” (there also were two other conditions that are not discussed here). As they had predicted, the bold Field Values took reliably longer than the non-bold Field Values (7.3 seconds vs. 6 seconds), and the bold Field Values elicited reliably poorer accuracy than the non-bold Field Values (86% vs. 92%). Even more surprising, when they analyzed the user’s eye movements, they found that participants spent reliably more time looking at the bold Field Values than the non-bold, and had reliably more eye fixations when looking at the bold. The “bold” formatting seemed to require longer processing time -- either in the eye or in the brain. They concluded that even subtle text formatting manipulations, such as the mis-use of bold and non-bold words, can have measurable (negative) effects on search time and accuracy. References |
|||||||||||||||||||
Home Contact Dr. Bob Bailey at (801) 201-2002 or bob@webusability.com Copyright 2002 - 2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||